Review



c glutamicum fm 1 strain  (ATCC)


Bioz Verified Symbol ATCC is a verified supplier
Bioz Manufacturer Symbol ATCC manufactures this product  
  • Logo
  • About
  • News
  • Press Release
  • Team
  • Advisors
  • Partners
  • Contact
  • Bioz Stars
  • Bioz vStars
  • 99

    Structured Review

    ATCC c glutamicum fm 1 strain
    Improving the tolerance to formaldehyde via ALE. (A) Growth <t>of</t> <t>FM-1</t> in minimal medium with 10 g/L glucose and different formaldehyde concentrations. 0 mM (square), 0.5 mM (triangle), 0.8 mM (circle), and 1 mM (inverted triangle). (B) ALE procedure of culture-1 in CGXII minimal medium supplemented with different formaldehyde concentrations and 10 g/L glucose. (C) Growth curve of the evolved mutants in CGXII minimal medium supplemented with 10 g/L glucose and 0.8 mM formaldehyde. (D) Growth curve of evolved mutant in CGXII minimal medium supplemented with 10 g/L glucose and 1.6 mM formaldehyde. (E) Growth curve of evolved mutant in CGXII minimal medium supplemented with 10 g/L glucose. (F) Formaldehyde degradation during cell growth of wild-type C. glutamicum ATCC 13032, FM-1 and FM-3. Values and error bars reflect the mean ± s.d. of three biological replicates (N = 3).
    C Glutamicum Fm 1 Strain, supplied by ATCC, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 99/100, based on 2206 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/result/c glutamicum fm 1 strain/product/ATCC
    Average 99 stars, based on 2206 article reviews
    c glutamicum fm 1 strain - by Bioz Stars, 2026-03
    99/100 stars

    Images

    1) Product Images from "Multi-omics analyses of evolved Corynebacterium glutamicum mutants reveal the molecular responses to formaldehyde stress"

    Article Title: Multi-omics analyses of evolved Corynebacterium glutamicum mutants reveal the molecular responses to formaldehyde stress

    Journal: Synthetic and Systems Biotechnology

    doi: 10.1016/j.synbio.2026.01.020

    Improving the tolerance to formaldehyde via ALE. (A) Growth of FM-1 in minimal medium with 10 g/L glucose and different formaldehyde concentrations. 0 mM (square), 0.5 mM (triangle), 0.8 mM (circle), and 1 mM (inverted triangle). (B) ALE procedure of culture-1 in CGXII minimal medium supplemented with different formaldehyde concentrations and 10 g/L glucose. (C) Growth curve of the evolved mutants in CGXII minimal medium supplemented with 10 g/L glucose and 0.8 mM formaldehyde. (D) Growth curve of evolved mutant in CGXII minimal medium supplemented with 10 g/L glucose and 1.6 mM formaldehyde. (E) Growth curve of evolved mutant in CGXII minimal medium supplemented with 10 g/L glucose. (F) Formaldehyde degradation during cell growth of wild-type C. glutamicum ATCC 13032, FM-1 and FM-3. Values and error bars reflect the mean ± s.d. of three biological replicates (N = 3).
    Figure Legend Snippet: Improving the tolerance to formaldehyde via ALE. (A) Growth of FM-1 in minimal medium with 10 g/L glucose and different formaldehyde concentrations. 0 mM (square), 0.5 mM (triangle), 0.8 mM (circle), and 1 mM (inverted triangle). (B) ALE procedure of culture-1 in CGXII minimal medium supplemented with different formaldehyde concentrations and 10 g/L glucose. (C) Growth curve of the evolved mutants in CGXII minimal medium supplemented with 10 g/L glucose and 0.8 mM formaldehyde. (D) Growth curve of evolved mutant in CGXII minimal medium supplemented with 10 g/L glucose and 1.6 mM formaldehyde. (E) Growth curve of evolved mutant in CGXII minimal medium supplemented with 10 g/L glucose. (F) Formaldehyde degradation during cell growth of wild-type C. glutamicum ATCC 13032, FM-1 and FM-3. Values and error bars reflect the mean ± s.d. of three biological replicates (N = 3).

    Techniques Used: Mutagenesis

    Effects of single-site mutations on formaldehyde tolerance. (A) Frequency of mutations of four bases in evolved strain FM-3. (B) Growth of strain FM-1 and its derivatives harboring single-site mutations on CGXII minimal agar medium supplemented with 10 g/L glucose and 1 mM formaldehyde. (C) Growth curves of strain FM-1 and its derivatives in CGXII medium supplemented with 10 g/L glucose and 0.8 mM formaldehyde. Values and error bars reflect the mean ± s.d. of three biological replicates (N = 3). Statistical significance at 31 h between FM-1- cgl1199 1015−1032del and FM-1 was determined by unpaired two-tailed Student's t -test: ∗∗∗P < 0.001.
    Figure Legend Snippet: Effects of single-site mutations on formaldehyde tolerance. (A) Frequency of mutations of four bases in evolved strain FM-3. (B) Growth of strain FM-1 and its derivatives harboring single-site mutations on CGXII minimal agar medium supplemented with 10 g/L glucose and 1 mM formaldehyde. (C) Growth curves of strain FM-1 and its derivatives in CGXII medium supplemented with 10 g/L glucose and 0.8 mM formaldehyde. Values and error bars reflect the mean ± s.d. of three biological replicates (N = 3). Statistical significance at 31 h between FM-1- cgl1199 1015−1032del and FM-1 was determined by unpaired two-tailed Student's t -test: ∗∗∗P < 0.001.

    Techniques Used: Two Tailed Test

    Transcriptome analysis of FM-3 and FM-1 cultivated with or without formaldehyde stress. (A) Volcano plots of differential transcription levels in 1F vs. 1N, 3F vs. 3N, 3N vs. 1N, and 3F vs. 1F. (B) Changes in mRNA levels of genes involved in central metabolism and the respiratory chain between FM-3 and FM-1. Only significant changes (log 2 (fold change) ≥1 or ≤ −1, FDR≤0.05) are shown. Upregulated and downregulated genes are indicated with red and blue, respectively. 1F, FM-1 cultivated with formaldehyde stress. 1N, FM-1 cultivated without formaldehyde stress. 3F, FM-3 cultivated with formaldehyde stress. 3N, FM-3 cultivated without formaldehyde stress.
    Figure Legend Snippet: Transcriptome analysis of FM-3 and FM-1 cultivated with or without formaldehyde stress. (A) Volcano plots of differential transcription levels in 1F vs. 1N, 3F vs. 3N, 3N vs. 1N, and 3F vs. 1F. (B) Changes in mRNA levels of genes involved in central metabolism and the respiratory chain between FM-3 and FM-1. Only significant changes (log 2 (fold change) ≥1 or ≤ −1, FDR≤0.05) are shown. Upregulated and downregulated genes are indicated with red and blue, respectively. 1F, FM-1 cultivated with formaldehyde stress. 1N, FM-1 cultivated without formaldehyde stress. 3F, FM-3 cultivated with formaldehyde stress. 3N, FM-3 cultivated without formaldehyde stress.

    Techniques Used:

    Comparison of proteomes between FM-3 and FM-1 cultivated with formaldehyde or without formaldehyde stress. Functional classification of transcriptome differences based on KEGG_small_class annotation in 3N vs. 1N (A), 3F vs. 1F (B). Proteins with differentially expression in 1F vs. 1N (C) and 3F vs. 3N (D). Only significant changes (log 2 (fold change) ≥1 or ≤ −1, FDR≤0.05) are shown. Proteins exhibiting increased or decreased abundance are highlighted in red and blue, respectively. 1F, FM-1 cultivated with formaldehyde stress. 1N, FM-1 cultivated without formaldehyde stress. 3F, FM-3 cultivated with formaldehyde stress. 3N, FM-3 cultivated without formaldehyde stress.
    Figure Legend Snippet: Comparison of proteomes between FM-3 and FM-1 cultivated with formaldehyde or without formaldehyde stress. Functional classification of transcriptome differences based on KEGG_small_class annotation in 3N vs. 1N (A), 3F vs. 1F (B). Proteins with differentially expression in 1F vs. 1N (C) and 3F vs. 3N (D). Only significant changes (log 2 (fold change) ≥1 or ≤ −1, FDR≤0.05) are shown. Proteins exhibiting increased or decreased abundance are highlighted in red and blue, respectively. 1F, FM-1 cultivated with formaldehyde stress. 1N, FM-1 cultivated without formaldehyde stress. 3F, FM-3 cultivated with formaldehyde stress. 3N, FM-3 cultivated without formaldehyde stress.

    Techniques Used: Comparison, Functional Assay, Expressing

    Effects of Cgl1590 mutations on formaldehyde tolerance. (A) Amino acid sequence alignment between Cgl1590 and its derivatives. (B) Effects of cgl1590 truncation on formaldehyde tolerance. (C) Effects of cgl1590 knock-out on formaldehyde tolerance. (D) Effects of cgl1590 overexpression on formaldehyde tolerance. Cells were treated with 0.8 mM formaldehyde as stress condition. Values and error bars reflect the mean ± s.d. of three biological replicates (N = 3). Analysis of cell length and morphology of FM-1 without formaldehyde stress (E), FM-1 containing cgl1590 750insG mutation without formaldehyde stress (F), FM-1 with formaldehyde stress (G), and FM-1 strain containing cgl1590 750insG mutation with formaldehyde stress (H). All strains were grown in CGXII minimal medium supplemented with 10 g/L glucose, with or without 0.8 mM formaldehyde, and examined by SEM. Cell length was determined by measuring 70 cells of each strain and analyzed using ImageJ software. Statistical significance at 36 h between FM-1-△ cgl1590 and FM-1 was determined by two-tailed Student's t -test: ∗∗∗P < 0.001.
    Figure Legend Snippet: Effects of Cgl1590 mutations on formaldehyde tolerance. (A) Amino acid sequence alignment between Cgl1590 and its derivatives. (B) Effects of cgl1590 truncation on formaldehyde tolerance. (C) Effects of cgl1590 knock-out on formaldehyde tolerance. (D) Effects of cgl1590 overexpression on formaldehyde tolerance. Cells were treated with 0.8 mM formaldehyde as stress condition. Values and error bars reflect the mean ± s.d. of three biological replicates (N = 3). Analysis of cell length and morphology of FM-1 without formaldehyde stress (E), FM-1 containing cgl1590 750insG mutation without formaldehyde stress (F), FM-1 with formaldehyde stress (G), and FM-1 strain containing cgl1590 750insG mutation with formaldehyde stress (H). All strains were grown in CGXII minimal medium supplemented with 10 g/L glucose, with or without 0.8 mM formaldehyde, and examined by SEM. Cell length was determined by measuring 70 cells of each strain and analyzed using ImageJ software. Statistical significance at 36 h between FM-1-△ cgl1590 and FM-1 was determined by two-tailed Student's t -test: ∗∗∗P < 0.001.

    Techniques Used: Sequencing, Knock-Out, Over Expression, Mutagenesis, Software, Two Tailed Test



    Similar Products

    99
    ATCC c glutamicum fm 1 strain
    Improving the tolerance to formaldehyde via ALE. (A) Growth <t>of</t> <t>FM-1</t> in minimal medium with 10 g/L glucose and different formaldehyde concentrations. 0 mM (square), 0.5 mM (triangle), 0.8 mM (circle), and 1 mM (inverted triangle). (B) ALE procedure of culture-1 in CGXII minimal medium supplemented with different formaldehyde concentrations and 10 g/L glucose. (C) Growth curve of the evolved mutants in CGXII minimal medium supplemented with 10 g/L glucose and 0.8 mM formaldehyde. (D) Growth curve of evolved mutant in CGXII minimal medium supplemented with 10 g/L glucose and 1.6 mM formaldehyde. (E) Growth curve of evolved mutant in CGXII minimal medium supplemented with 10 g/L glucose. (F) Formaldehyde degradation during cell growth of wild-type C. glutamicum ATCC 13032, FM-1 and FM-3. Values and error bars reflect the mean ± s.d. of three biological replicates (N = 3).
    C Glutamicum Fm 1 Strain, supplied by ATCC, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 99/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/result/c glutamicum fm 1 strain/product/ATCC
    Average 99 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    c glutamicum fm 1 strain - by Bioz Stars, 2026-03
    99/100 stars
      Buy from Supplier

    Image Search Results


    Improving the tolerance to formaldehyde via ALE. (A) Growth of FM-1 in minimal medium with 10 g/L glucose and different formaldehyde concentrations. 0 mM (square), 0.5 mM (triangle), 0.8 mM (circle), and 1 mM (inverted triangle). (B) ALE procedure of culture-1 in CGXII minimal medium supplemented with different formaldehyde concentrations and 10 g/L glucose. (C) Growth curve of the evolved mutants in CGXII minimal medium supplemented with 10 g/L glucose and 0.8 mM formaldehyde. (D) Growth curve of evolved mutant in CGXII minimal medium supplemented with 10 g/L glucose and 1.6 mM formaldehyde. (E) Growth curve of evolved mutant in CGXII minimal medium supplemented with 10 g/L glucose. (F) Formaldehyde degradation during cell growth of wild-type C. glutamicum ATCC 13032, FM-1 and FM-3. Values and error bars reflect the mean ± s.d. of three biological replicates (N = 3).

    Journal: Synthetic and Systems Biotechnology

    Article Title: Multi-omics analyses of evolved Corynebacterium glutamicum mutants reveal the molecular responses to formaldehyde stress

    doi: 10.1016/j.synbio.2026.01.020

    Figure Lengend Snippet: Improving the tolerance to formaldehyde via ALE. (A) Growth of FM-1 in minimal medium with 10 g/L glucose and different formaldehyde concentrations. 0 mM (square), 0.5 mM (triangle), 0.8 mM (circle), and 1 mM (inverted triangle). (B) ALE procedure of culture-1 in CGXII minimal medium supplemented with different formaldehyde concentrations and 10 g/L glucose. (C) Growth curve of the evolved mutants in CGXII minimal medium supplemented with 10 g/L glucose and 0.8 mM formaldehyde. (D) Growth curve of evolved mutant in CGXII minimal medium supplemented with 10 g/L glucose and 1.6 mM formaldehyde. (E) Growth curve of evolved mutant in CGXII minimal medium supplemented with 10 g/L glucose. (F) Formaldehyde degradation during cell growth of wild-type C. glutamicum ATCC 13032, FM-1 and FM-3. Values and error bars reflect the mean ± s.d. of three biological replicates (N = 3).

    Article Snippet: To assess the toxicity of formaldehyde in C. glutamicum ATCC 13032 lacking the formaldehyde dissimilation pathway, we cultivated a previously developed C. glutamicum FM-1 strain ( C. glutamicum ATCC 13032 Δ adhE Δ ald ), which was referred to as MX-1 in our previous study [ ], in CGXII medium supplemented with various concentrations of formaldehyde ( A).

    Techniques: Mutagenesis

    Effects of single-site mutations on formaldehyde tolerance. (A) Frequency of mutations of four bases in evolved strain FM-3. (B) Growth of strain FM-1 and its derivatives harboring single-site mutations on CGXII minimal agar medium supplemented with 10 g/L glucose and 1 mM formaldehyde. (C) Growth curves of strain FM-1 and its derivatives in CGXII medium supplemented with 10 g/L glucose and 0.8 mM formaldehyde. Values and error bars reflect the mean ± s.d. of three biological replicates (N = 3). Statistical significance at 31 h between FM-1- cgl1199 1015−1032del and FM-1 was determined by unpaired two-tailed Student's t -test: ∗∗∗P < 0.001.

    Journal: Synthetic and Systems Biotechnology

    Article Title: Multi-omics analyses of evolved Corynebacterium glutamicum mutants reveal the molecular responses to formaldehyde stress

    doi: 10.1016/j.synbio.2026.01.020

    Figure Lengend Snippet: Effects of single-site mutations on formaldehyde tolerance. (A) Frequency of mutations of four bases in evolved strain FM-3. (B) Growth of strain FM-1 and its derivatives harboring single-site mutations on CGXII minimal agar medium supplemented with 10 g/L glucose and 1 mM formaldehyde. (C) Growth curves of strain FM-1 and its derivatives in CGXII medium supplemented with 10 g/L glucose and 0.8 mM formaldehyde. Values and error bars reflect the mean ± s.d. of three biological replicates (N = 3). Statistical significance at 31 h between FM-1- cgl1199 1015−1032del and FM-1 was determined by unpaired two-tailed Student's t -test: ∗∗∗P < 0.001.

    Article Snippet: To assess the toxicity of formaldehyde in C. glutamicum ATCC 13032 lacking the formaldehyde dissimilation pathway, we cultivated a previously developed C. glutamicum FM-1 strain ( C. glutamicum ATCC 13032 Δ adhE Δ ald ), which was referred to as MX-1 in our previous study [ ], in CGXII medium supplemented with various concentrations of formaldehyde ( A).

    Techniques: Two Tailed Test

    Transcriptome analysis of FM-3 and FM-1 cultivated with or without formaldehyde stress. (A) Volcano plots of differential transcription levels in 1F vs. 1N, 3F vs. 3N, 3N vs. 1N, and 3F vs. 1F. (B) Changes in mRNA levels of genes involved in central metabolism and the respiratory chain between FM-3 and FM-1. Only significant changes (log 2 (fold change) ≥1 or ≤ −1, FDR≤0.05) are shown. Upregulated and downregulated genes are indicated with red and blue, respectively. 1F, FM-1 cultivated with formaldehyde stress. 1N, FM-1 cultivated without formaldehyde stress. 3F, FM-3 cultivated with formaldehyde stress. 3N, FM-3 cultivated without formaldehyde stress.

    Journal: Synthetic and Systems Biotechnology

    Article Title: Multi-omics analyses of evolved Corynebacterium glutamicum mutants reveal the molecular responses to formaldehyde stress

    doi: 10.1016/j.synbio.2026.01.020

    Figure Lengend Snippet: Transcriptome analysis of FM-3 and FM-1 cultivated with or without formaldehyde stress. (A) Volcano plots of differential transcription levels in 1F vs. 1N, 3F vs. 3N, 3N vs. 1N, and 3F vs. 1F. (B) Changes in mRNA levels of genes involved in central metabolism and the respiratory chain between FM-3 and FM-1. Only significant changes (log 2 (fold change) ≥1 or ≤ −1, FDR≤0.05) are shown. Upregulated and downregulated genes are indicated with red and blue, respectively. 1F, FM-1 cultivated with formaldehyde stress. 1N, FM-1 cultivated without formaldehyde stress. 3F, FM-3 cultivated with formaldehyde stress. 3N, FM-3 cultivated without formaldehyde stress.

    Article Snippet: To assess the toxicity of formaldehyde in C. glutamicum ATCC 13032 lacking the formaldehyde dissimilation pathway, we cultivated a previously developed C. glutamicum FM-1 strain ( C. glutamicum ATCC 13032 Δ adhE Δ ald ), which was referred to as MX-1 in our previous study [ ], in CGXII medium supplemented with various concentrations of formaldehyde ( A).

    Techniques:

    Comparison of proteomes between FM-3 and FM-1 cultivated with formaldehyde or without formaldehyde stress. Functional classification of transcriptome differences based on KEGG_small_class annotation in 3N vs. 1N (A), 3F vs. 1F (B). Proteins with differentially expression in 1F vs. 1N (C) and 3F vs. 3N (D). Only significant changes (log 2 (fold change) ≥1 or ≤ −1, FDR≤0.05) are shown. Proteins exhibiting increased or decreased abundance are highlighted in red and blue, respectively. 1F, FM-1 cultivated with formaldehyde stress. 1N, FM-1 cultivated without formaldehyde stress. 3F, FM-3 cultivated with formaldehyde stress. 3N, FM-3 cultivated without formaldehyde stress.

    Journal: Synthetic and Systems Biotechnology

    Article Title: Multi-omics analyses of evolved Corynebacterium glutamicum mutants reveal the molecular responses to formaldehyde stress

    doi: 10.1016/j.synbio.2026.01.020

    Figure Lengend Snippet: Comparison of proteomes between FM-3 and FM-1 cultivated with formaldehyde or without formaldehyde stress. Functional classification of transcriptome differences based on KEGG_small_class annotation in 3N vs. 1N (A), 3F vs. 1F (B). Proteins with differentially expression in 1F vs. 1N (C) and 3F vs. 3N (D). Only significant changes (log 2 (fold change) ≥1 or ≤ −1, FDR≤0.05) are shown. Proteins exhibiting increased or decreased abundance are highlighted in red and blue, respectively. 1F, FM-1 cultivated with formaldehyde stress. 1N, FM-1 cultivated without formaldehyde stress. 3F, FM-3 cultivated with formaldehyde stress. 3N, FM-3 cultivated without formaldehyde stress.

    Article Snippet: To assess the toxicity of formaldehyde in C. glutamicum ATCC 13032 lacking the formaldehyde dissimilation pathway, we cultivated a previously developed C. glutamicum FM-1 strain ( C. glutamicum ATCC 13032 Δ adhE Δ ald ), which was referred to as MX-1 in our previous study [ ], in CGXII medium supplemented with various concentrations of formaldehyde ( A).

    Techniques: Comparison, Functional Assay, Expressing

    Effects of Cgl1590 mutations on formaldehyde tolerance. (A) Amino acid sequence alignment between Cgl1590 and its derivatives. (B) Effects of cgl1590 truncation on formaldehyde tolerance. (C) Effects of cgl1590 knock-out on formaldehyde tolerance. (D) Effects of cgl1590 overexpression on formaldehyde tolerance. Cells were treated with 0.8 mM formaldehyde as stress condition. Values and error bars reflect the mean ± s.d. of three biological replicates (N = 3). Analysis of cell length and morphology of FM-1 without formaldehyde stress (E), FM-1 containing cgl1590 750insG mutation without formaldehyde stress (F), FM-1 with formaldehyde stress (G), and FM-1 strain containing cgl1590 750insG mutation with formaldehyde stress (H). All strains were grown in CGXII minimal medium supplemented with 10 g/L glucose, with or without 0.8 mM formaldehyde, and examined by SEM. Cell length was determined by measuring 70 cells of each strain and analyzed using ImageJ software. Statistical significance at 36 h between FM-1-△ cgl1590 and FM-1 was determined by two-tailed Student's t -test: ∗∗∗P < 0.001.

    Journal: Synthetic and Systems Biotechnology

    Article Title: Multi-omics analyses of evolved Corynebacterium glutamicum mutants reveal the molecular responses to formaldehyde stress

    doi: 10.1016/j.synbio.2026.01.020

    Figure Lengend Snippet: Effects of Cgl1590 mutations on formaldehyde tolerance. (A) Amino acid sequence alignment between Cgl1590 and its derivatives. (B) Effects of cgl1590 truncation on formaldehyde tolerance. (C) Effects of cgl1590 knock-out on formaldehyde tolerance. (D) Effects of cgl1590 overexpression on formaldehyde tolerance. Cells were treated with 0.8 mM formaldehyde as stress condition. Values and error bars reflect the mean ± s.d. of three biological replicates (N = 3). Analysis of cell length and morphology of FM-1 without formaldehyde stress (E), FM-1 containing cgl1590 750insG mutation without formaldehyde stress (F), FM-1 with formaldehyde stress (G), and FM-1 strain containing cgl1590 750insG mutation with formaldehyde stress (H). All strains were grown in CGXII minimal medium supplemented with 10 g/L glucose, with or without 0.8 mM formaldehyde, and examined by SEM. Cell length was determined by measuring 70 cells of each strain and analyzed using ImageJ software. Statistical significance at 36 h between FM-1-△ cgl1590 and FM-1 was determined by two-tailed Student's t -test: ∗∗∗P < 0.001.

    Article Snippet: To assess the toxicity of formaldehyde in C. glutamicum ATCC 13032 lacking the formaldehyde dissimilation pathway, we cultivated a previously developed C. glutamicum FM-1 strain ( C. glutamicum ATCC 13032 Δ adhE Δ ald ), which was referred to as MX-1 in our previous study [ ], in CGXII medium supplemented with various concentrations of formaldehyde ( A).

    Techniques: Sequencing, Knock-Out, Over Expression, Mutagenesis, Software, Two Tailed Test